<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Equidistant objects with css - another way</title>
	<atom:link href="http://vitaminkdesign.com/blog/2008/10/21/equidistant-objects-with-css-another-way/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://vitaminkdesign.com/blog/2008/10/21/equidistant-objects-with-css-another-way/</link>
	<description>default theme - just getting up and running</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 17:41:37 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://vitaminkdesign.com/blog/2008/10/21/equidistant-objects-with-css-another-way/#comment-3679</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 10:13:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.10secondtourism.com/?p=22#comment-3679</guid>
		<description>lbt - took me a moment to work out what you were proposing but looks like it would be a good way of making it more modular... Thanks for the suggestion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>lbt - took me a moment to work out what you were proposing but looks like it would be a good way of making it more modular&#8230; Thanks for the suggestion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lbt</title>
		<link>http://vitaminkdesign.com/blog/2008/10/21/equidistant-objects-with-css-another-way/#comment-3673</link>
		<dc:creator>lbt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2009 10:06:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.10secondtourism.com/?p=22#comment-3673</guid>
		<description>You can also do:
 .n1{margin-left:-6em;display:inline;/*just to fix ie6*/}

 .n2of4,.n3of4,.n4of4{width:33.3%!important;text-align:right;width:33.2%;}

 .n2of5,.n3of5,.n4of5,.n5of5{width:20%!important;text-align:right;width:20%;}

 .n2of6,.n3of6,.n4of6,.n5of6,.n6of6{width:16.66%!important;text-align:right;width:16.5%;}

etc</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can also do:<br />
 .n1{margin-left:-6em;display:inline;/*just to fix ie6*/}</p>
<p> .n2of4,.n3of4,.n4of4{width:33.3%!important;text-align:right;width:33.2%;}</p>
<p> .n2of5,.n3of5,.n4of5,.n5of5{width:20%!important;text-align:right;width:20%;}</p>
<p> .n2of6,.n3of6,.n4of6,.n5of6,.n6of6{width:16.66%!important;text-align:right;width:16.5%;}</p>
<p>etc</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://vitaminkdesign.com/blog/2008/10/21/equidistant-objects-with-css-another-way/#comment-2294</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 21:31:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.10secondtourism.com/?p=22#comment-2294</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the comment Thierry. I wasn't aware of your (or Paul O'brien's ) method of containing floats. In the past I have used overflow:auto which on the surface solved the problem but I found it did create scrollbars in some situations. I'll be sure to take a look at your method though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the comment Thierry. I wasn&#8217;t aware of your (or Paul O&#8217;brien&#8217;s ) method of containing floats. In the past I have used overflow:auto which on the surface solved the problem but I found it did create scrollbars in some situations. I&#8217;ll be sure to take a look at your method though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thierry</title>
		<link>http://vitaminkdesign.com/blog/2008/10/21/equidistant-objects-with-css-another-way/#comment-2290</link>
		<dc:creator>Thierry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 15:56:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.10secondtourism.com/?p=22#comment-2290</guid>
		<description>Very nice, but I'd use "overflow:hidden" on the UL rather than the "clearFix" method.
See: http://tjkdesign.com/articles/clearing-floats_and_block-formatting_context.asp</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very nice, but I&#8217;d use &#8220;overflow:hidden&#8221; on the UL rather than the &#8220;clearFix&#8221; method.<br />
See: <a href="http://tjkdesign.com/articles/clearing-floats_and_block-formatting_context.asp" rel="nofollow">http://tjkdesign.com/articles/clearing-floats_and_block-formatting_context.asp</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>


